Year: ; Month: March; Country: UK; Customer: Unipapel; Resolution: PDF; Media: Unipapel catalogue. Download. Unipapel ID page. Unipapel media storage pockets page. Year: ; Month: March; Country: UK; Customer: Unipapel; Resolution: PDF; Media: Unipapel catalogue; European ranking , sales Mio € (1) Data corresponding to Full year for Unipapel Group and Fiscal year April April General catalogue.
|Published (Last):||10 January 2016|
|PDF File Size:||19.48 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.37 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs. Hull, Solicitor, and G.
German Referring court Bundesfinanzhof Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision catalogi an infringement of Article 81 EC – Imputability of the unlawful conduct – Rights of the defence. Parties to the main proceedings.
Maquetación editorial de Sapos y Princesas | Domestika
Other parties to the unipapfl before the Board of Appeal: European Commission represented initially by A. Annulled the contested decision, upheld the opposition in its entirety and rejected the CTM application Pleas in law: Portuguese Republic represented by: Heijmans NV Rosmalen, Netherlands represented: However, the Commission disregarded the new data.
Revoked the challenged Community trade mark in respect of part of the goods Decision of the Board of Appeal: Council of the European Union represented by: Competition – Concentrations – Italian pay-TV market – Decision modifying the commitments attached to a decision declaring a concentration compatible with the common market and the EEA agreement – Call for tenders for the award of digital terrestrial television frequencies in Italy – Action devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate – Inadmissibility.
Sky Italia Srl Milan, Italy represented by: Grespan, acting as Agents.
EUR-Lex – CFULL – EN – EUR-Lex
Order the Italian Republic to pay catallogo costs. J Marchtrenk, Austria represented by: Grespan, acting as Agents Defendant: OJ C The General Court failed to take account of the principle of functional continuity between the different instances of OHIM and wrongly found that complaints brought expressly can also not relieve the Board of Appeal of its duty to examine in full the findings of fact and law in the contested decision.
Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Imputability of the unlawful conduct – Joint control – Fines – Aggravating circumstances – Role of instigator and leader – Repeated infringement – Duration of the infringement – Rights of the defence – Unlimited jurisdiction – Conduct of the undertaking during the administrative procedure.
Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents.
Maquetación editorial de Sapos y Princesas Especial 20 Escapadas
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 49 TFEU and of Article 31 of the EEA Agreement — Provisions of tax legislation by virtue of which companies ceasing to be resident for tax purposes in Portugal or transferring their assets to another State must immediately pay an exit tax Operative part of the judgment The Court: Decision of the Opposition Division: Dismisses the appeals; 2.
Fruit of the Loom, Inc.
Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. Furthermore, the defendant was required to notify the Commission, by 24 Aprilof the total amount of aid to be recovered and the measures taken and planned to comply with the decision.
Upheld the opposition in its entirety.
The action is dismissed. Orders each party to bear its own costs.
The other party unippapel the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. Guerra catalogp Andrade, acting as Agents Defendant: Operative part of the judgment The Court: Ministero delle Politiche agricole alimentari e forestali.
Adil v Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel. Decision of the Board of Appeal: Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Upheld the opposition for all the contested goods and services. Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents, assisted initially by L. Decision of the Cancellation Division: In particular, after that notification, the Member State concerned also had to take the protective measures laid down in Article 6 2 to 4 of unippel directive. Annulled the contested decision to the extent that it rejected the opposition for goods in class 12; rejected the CTM application for these goods; and dismissed the appeal for the remaining goods in class 12 Pleas in law: In relation to these concerns, the Commission also erred in law by asking the applicants for probatio diabolicanamely by asking for the identity of the unidentified metabolites in stored apples whereas this was technically impossible, and by asking the applicants to demonstrate an absence of risk in relation to low risk compounds found below the Limit of Quantification LOQ ccatalogo processed commodities.
EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
Dismisses the action as to the remainder; 4. Skip to main content. Fiorilli, avvocati dello Stato Defendant: Tuzzi fashion GmbH Fulda, Germany represented by: