The term “superorganic” was probably first used by the early sociologist Herbert of the time, Alfred Kroeber and Edward Sapir, in the American Anthropologist. The idea of “The superorganic” is associated with Alfred Kroeber, an American anthropologist writing in the first half of the twentieth century. Why the Superorganic Concept Serves the Human Sciences Badly. Peter J. Richerson University of California – Los Angeles. Los Angeles . Dobzhansky’s usage was probably inspired Kroeber and kindred influential social. scientists of his.

Author: Babei Dikasa
Country: Guatemala
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 3 October 2018
Pages: 380
PDF File Size: 19.52 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.15 Mb
ISBN: 568-1-28701-995-2
Downloads: 91406
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shajas

Knowing the dynamics of how carbon atoms operate, or that krroeber hydrogen and oxygen can result in a rapid combustion if not an explosion, does not explain how the tree works, with its leaves converting sunlight into energy to change water and carbon dioxide into oxygen and carbon, channels to transfer sap from leaves to zuperorganico, and so on.

If you analyse all those parts, in themselves, or even as a collection, they are not living. Human beings are animals, and as such are organic systems.



They have developed communications between themselves to an elaborate degree, much more sophisticated than other animals. It operates at a higher level of complexity than the organic.

Culture and society comprise the third level. A living entity transcends its inorganic parts. They behave, however, in concert with each other, as a system external to individuals —— society.

Humans have thoughts and behaviour. It may have a superorganici of its own, but its life more resembles an amoeba than a human.

There is a parallel, therefore, in the relations between the inorganic and the organic, as between the organic and the superorganic. Do not think of a dog as a carbon atom or a hydrocarbon molecule. The socio-cultural level, culture or society, therefore is carried by humans and transcends humans.

If you copy text from this site, please acknowledge the author s and link it back to cec. We can call this the lowest level of complexity.

Similarly, do not think of a community, an institution, a society as a human being. The links are symbolic, not genetic as in biological systems. Similarly, the dog, if seen as a biological system, operates at a higher complexity than the inorganic elements which comprise it.


The superorganic is another way of describing —— and understanding —— culture or the socio-cultural system. The arrangement makes them alive. Looking at the relationship between living things and their inorganic components in this way helps us to understand the relationship between culture and persons.

Do not anthropomorphise culture. If you separate the dog or tree into its separate elements, it dies. If we start with the inorganic, it is the physical universe, all the atoms of elements without life. Key Words Modules Sociology: All living things, superorgabico and animals, are built up of inorganic elements, mainly hydrogen, oxygen and carbon, plus some trace elements.

Culture as the superorganic

The second level of complexity is composed of living things. Those are carried by individuals. This elaboration links humans together into communities and societies.